Many people first think of offshore planning when they consider Florida asset protection planning. Many books have been published and many websites constructed to promote Florida offshore asset protection tools. Many experts, both attorneys and financial planners, promote complicated and expensive foreign based asset protection entities. Many people are eager to accept offshore asset protection as the ultimate, albeit expensive, solution to their legal exposure. In practice, offshore asset protection most often is not the best asset protection tool for Florida residents. Most Florida residents are able to adequately protect themselves using the many exemptions provided by Florida law.
How Offshore Planning Works
Offshore planning uses legal entities in favorable foreign jurisdictions under the control of trustees or managers who are neither United States citizens nor persons having a business presence in the United States. The purpose of offshore planning is to move legal battles with creditors to jurisdictions beyond the reach of the United States courts. Offshore planning promises asset protection because certain countries do not recognize judgments rendered by U.S. courts. In order for judgment creditors to reach assets located in such jurisdictions, a creditor must start over and institute the lawsuit against the defendant to establish a new judgment in the foreign court system.
The second purported advantage of offshore planning is that favorable offshore jurisdictions have relatively short statute of limitations on fraudulent transfer. Domestic asset protection is often vulnerable to a creditor’s allegations that the debtor has transferred assets, or has converted one type of asset to another asset, in an effort to defraud or delay creditor’s collection. Most states have a four-year statute of limitations, which means that a creditor’s attorney can attack asset transfers or conversions up to four years after the transfers. But in some offshore areas, the fraudulent transfer time period is only two years. The shorter statute of limitations makes it easier for debtors to delay collection until after the statute of limitations has expired to challenge asset protection transfers.
The most popular offshore legal tool is the offshore asset protection trust. Simply stated, the offshore trust resembles a typical U.S. trust except that the offshore trust is a “self-settled trust” where the settlor and the beneficiary are the same person. In addition to asset protection benefits, self-settled offshore trusts provide a means of transferring assets between generations free of probate.
A more cost effective offshore asset protection vehicle is the Nevis/St. Kitts limited liability company. The Nevis LLC is simpler and less costly than an offshore trust, but it provides comparable asset protection. Nevis LLC law permits the U.S. owner to serve as manager, although the owners will most likely resign in favor of a foreign manager if the owner perceives future legal liability.
Offshore Bank Accounts
Many people believe that they can protect cash deposits from their creditors simply by opening an offshore bank account. If their money is an account at a bank with no U.S. branches or offices, a creditor will have difficulty garnishing the debtor’s bank account. It is now very difficult for a U.S. citizen to open foreign bank accounts. In practice, the easiest way to deposit money in a foreign bank is to first establish a foreign LLC or trust and then have a foreign LLC manager or trustee open the account in the name of the foreign entity. Foreign managers and trustees have relationships with banks that enable them to open accounts on behalf of their U.S. clients.
Any offshore asset protection requires tax filings with the IRS to report and disclose ownership of foreign entities and money held, directly or indirectly, in foreign bank accounts. The tax filings are informational, and offshore asset protection planning does not reduce or increase income tax liability of U.S. residents. People must discuss with their own CPA the reporting requirements related to their own offshore asset protection plan.
When Offshore Planning Will Not Work
Bankruptcy: Offshore planning is less effective in bankruptcy than it is in state court collection cases. State courts have jurisdiction over assets located in their particular state. Bankruptcy courts are federal courts and have jurisdiction over assets worldwide. Transferring assets to foreign accounts owned by an offshore entity does not remove these assets from the reach of the bankruptcy trustee. The bankruptcy court may issue orders affecting title to assets located outside the U.S. A trustee may order the debtor to take affirmative steps to turn over the assets. The bankruptcy judge may hold a debtor in contempt subject to imprisonment if the debtor does not comply with the court’s turnover order.
Tax Avoidance: U.S. citizens are subject to income tax on income earned anywhere in the world. Taxpayers must report all income earned by assets held in offshore financial accounts. Offshore asset protection planning will not reduce, avoid, or defer any U.S. taxation. Some U.S. businesses obtain a legitimate tax advantage by conducting active businesses wholly outside the U.S., but these tax strategies do not apply for individuals’ passive income from investments held outside the U.S.
Divorce: In a divorce, both spouses must fully disclosed, under oath, all of their assets wherever located. Disclosure of U.S. financial accounts will reveal transfers of assets to offshore entities. All of the spouse’s assets are taken into account in the court’s equitable distribution of marital assets. Therefore, whatever assets a spouse holds in an offshore jurisdiction will factor into the court’s division of U.S. assets. Generally, the more assets a spouse holds offshore, the less amount of U.S. assets will be awarded to that spouse in the equitable distribution of marital assets.
Secrecy: Many people believe that asset protection planning is based upon or involves hiding assets. They assume that creditors will not know about assets held in offshore entities run by offshore trustees. Because U.S. taxpayers report all offshore income, your tax returns will reveal offshore financial accounts which generate income. Offshore accounts may provide privacy and a lower “financial profile” in general business dealings, but once litigation commences, and certainly after a judgment is awarded, offshore accounts do not effectively hide assets.
Tax Reporting for Offshore Asset Protection Entities
Any type of offshore asset protection is complicated because of IRS reporting requirements applicable to foreign entities. People considering offshore asset protection should consult with a tax attorney or a CPA experienced in international tax law. There are severe penalties for failure to comply with foreign entity reporting requirements. If you are engaged in offshore asset protection, you must consult with a CPA experienced with international tax issues or a tax attorney. The tax reporting requirements are one of the reasons I usually try to accomplish asset protection with domestic tools under Florida exemptions before recommending more sophisticated offshore entities.
Limited Liability Companies: A single-member domestic limited liability company is by default a disregarded entity (“DE”) for tax purposes. The domestic LLC on the entity level reports nothing to the IRS and is not required to get a separate tax number. Any domestic LLC is a DE unless it elects a different tax status by filing Form 8832 with the IRS. A single-member foreign LLC established by a U.S. resident must file Form 8832 to claim a disregard entity status. If this form is not filed timely, the LLC may be treated as a C-corporation and subject to corporate taxation. In addition, after electing disregarded status the offshore LLC must file information Form 8858. Offshore entities taxed as a partnership or corporation having different filing requirements.
Foreign Corporations: U.S. taxpayers, domestic trusts, or domestic corporations must report any transfers to a foreign corporation by filing IRS Form 926. A U.S. taxpayer who directly or indirectly owns any interest in certain foreign corporations may have to file IRS Form 5471.
Foreign Partnerships: Any U.S. taxpayer that controls a foreign partnership must file Form 8865. A person controls a partnership if they hold more than 50 percent of the partnership interests. If no partner has a controlling share, then all partners with more than 10 percent partnership interest must file Form 8865. In addition, U.S. taxpayers who acquire or dispose of partnership interests in a foreign partnership must disclose the transaction to the IRS. Most foreign LLCs with two or more persons are a foreign partnership for tax purposes.
Reporting Foreign Bank Accounts and Financial Accounts: Most people who create offshore entities have the entity maintain a bank account outside the U.S. The people are required to notify the IRS about their offshore financial accounts by filing a form TDF90-22.1 U.S. taxpayers must disclose all offshore financial accounts for which they have signatory authority or for which they have control over a third party who has signatory authority by filing the TDF90-22.1. For example, if you appoint someone to be a manager of your foreign LLC, and the manager maintains a financial account offshore, you must file a tax reporting form. The TDF90-22.1 form is due on or before June 30 of each year, and there are no extensions. Offshore accounts also must be disclosed on your 1040 income tax return in Part III of Schedule B. Willful non-compliance is a criminal offense.