Nevis LLC Formation and Charging Order Protection

A Nevis LLC is a limited liability company formed under the Nevis LLC ordinance, which Nevis rewrote and re-enacted in full, effective 2018. The structure lets a U.S. resident hold assets in a jurisdiction whose courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against a member’s interest. The only creditor remedy there expires after three years, and a fraudulent transfer claim must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Among offshore asset protection options, a Nevis LLC is one of the most cost-effective. Unlike an offshore trust, the member keeps direct control, managing accounts, directing investments, and retaining signatory authority. A U.S. court can treat that membership interest as personal property located where the member lives. A Nevis LLC works on its own or as the operating company owned by a Cook Islands trust or Nevis trust.

How Does the Charging Order Work?

A Nevis LLC limits a judgment creditor to a single remedy under Nevis law: a charging order against the member’s interest. The order entitles the creditor to receive distributions that would otherwise go to the debtor-member, but it confers no ownership rights, no voting rights, no management authority, and no ability to force the LLC to make distributions.

If the LLC retains earnings rather than distributing them, the creditor receives nothing. The charging order expires after three years and cannot be renewed. During that period, the debtor retains all rights of membership as if the charging order did not exist.

The creditor cannot foreclose on the membership interest, cannot force a liquidation, and cannot pursue reverse veil-piercing to reach the LLC’s underlying assets. A creditor holding a U.S. judgment must retain Nevis counsel on a non-contingent fee basis, post a bond in an amount set by the Nevis High Court, and pursue a new proceeding under Nevis law.

Speak With Our Attorneys

Jon and Gideon Alper specialize in creating Cook Islands trusts for clients nationwide. Consultations are free and confidential, by phone or Zoom, and usually available within one business day. You’ll speak directly with the attorney.

Request a Free Consultation
Attorneys Jon Alper and Gideon Alper

The Domestic Enforcement Problem

A U.S. court may treat a membership interest in a foreign LLC as intangible personal property located wherever the debtor lives, which puts it within reach of the debtor’s home-state court and that state’s remedies. In Wells Fargo Bank v. Barber, a 2015 Florida case, a federal court held that a debtor’s interest in a single-member Nevis LLC sits in Florida with its owner. Florida law rather than Nevis law therefore governed how the creditor could reach it, and the court let the creditor proceed with a claim to foreclose the interest.

Florida courts have gone the other way when the asset is a physical certificate held abroad, holding that a Florida court has no jurisdiction over property located outside the state. Whether an LLC interest travels with its owner or stays where the company is registered has not been tested often enough to be settled, which leaves real risk for anyone who relies on a standalone Nevis LLC.

The risk of domestic enforcement is the main reason a Nevis LLC works best when an offshore trust owns it. When a Cook Islands trust or Nevis trust owns 100% of the LLC, the trust is the member and the debtor no longer holds a membership interest that a U.S. court can characterize as local property. Pairing an offshore trust with an offshore LLC removes the exposure a standalone LLC leaves open.

Fraudulent Transfer Protections

Nevis law requires a creditor challenging a transfer into a Nevis LLC to prove fraud beyond a reasonable doubt, the criminal standard of proof applied to a civil claim. The creditor must show that the member made the transfer with the principal intent to defraud that particular creditor, and that the transfer is what left the member unable to satisfy the claim.

The solvency test is measured immediately after the transfer, and it counts the member’s remaining property plus the value of the member’s interest in the LLC, though not the LLC’s own assets. If that total still exceeded the creditor’s claim, Nevis law deems the transfer not fraudulent even where the member acted with intent. The creditor’s recovery is limited to the transferred property and its proceeds—no right of action exists against other LLC assets or other members.

Nevis law also cuts off most challenges on timing. A transfer made more than two years after the creditor’s cause of action arose cannot be attacked as fraudulent at all. If the transfer falls inside that two-year window, it is protected unless the creditor files suit within one year of the transfer. A transfer made before the creditor’s cause of action arose is never fraudulent under Nevis law.

Bond Requirement

Nevis law requires any creditor to post a bond before initiating proceedings against a Nevis LLC member. The ordinance does not fix a dollar amount. The Nevis High Court sets the bond, which is deposited with the Ministry of Finance and secures the costs the creditor must pay if the claim fails. That upfront commitment stops most collection actions before they start.

Single-Member Protections

Single-member Nevis LLCs receive the same statutory protections as multi-member LLCs. The charging order limit, the bond requirement, and the criminal standard of proof for fraudulent transfer claims all apply regardless of membership count. Many U.S. courts treat single-member LLCs less favorably and may permit foreclosure or turnover of the sole member’s interest.

Formation and Management

A Nevis LLC is formed by filing articles of organization through a Nevis-based registered agent. The process can be completed remotely and typically takes one to three weeks. The member does not need to travel to Nevis.

The LLC must have a registered agent in Nevis at all times. Member and manager identities are not disclosed in any public registry, which provides ownership privacy that domestic LLCs in most U.S. states cannot match.

The member can be the initial manager, retaining direct control over the LLC’s financial accounts, investment decisions, and day-to-day operations. The member can also name a foreign individual or entity as successor manager, to take over if a creditor threat materializes. The operating agreement should define when the successor manager takes over and should bar the debtor-member from removing the foreign manager after that appointment.

When the Nevis LLC is paired with an offshore trust, the trust is the sole member and the LLC’s operating agreement designates the trustee (or a trustee-appointed entity) as successor manager. The U.S. individual is the initial manager during ordinary times and is removed by the trustee when litigation arises.

Nevis also lets an existing U.S. LLC move its domicile to Nevis. The company stays the same entity, so its assets stay where they are without new deeds or assignments, which avoids the transfer taxes and documentary stamp charges that moving assets one at a time would trigger. The application requires a declaration that the move is made in good faith and will not hinder, delay, or defraud existing creditors.

The two provisions below are the ones an operating agreement for a Nevis LLC is built around.

Sample Charging Order and Exclusive Remedy Clause

Creditor Remedies Against a Member’s Interest.

(a) Sole remedy. The Members agree that a charging order granted under the Nevis Limited Liability Company Ordinance is the only remedy a creditor of a Member may pursue against that Member’s interest in the Company. No creditor of a Member may foreclose upon a Member’s interest, compel a sale of it, obtain an order dissolving or winding up the Company, or reach the property of the Company on any theory that disregards the separate existence of the Company.

(b) Rights of the holder. A person holding a charging order against a Member’s interest has the rights of an assignee of that interest and no rights beyond them. That person is not a Member, may not vote or give or withhold consent on any matter, may not participate in the management of the Company, may not require the Company to produce books, records, tax information, or an accounting, and may not compel a distribution.

(c) Distributions. Distributions are made when, and in the amounts, the Manager determines in the Manager’s sole discretion. Nothing in this Agreement obliges the Company to make a distribution, and the existence of a charging order is not a reason to make one. Any amount that would otherwise be distributable in respect of a charged interest may first be applied against a capital call, loan, indemnity, or other obligation that the Member owes the Company.

(d) Expiration. When a charging order expires, lapses, is discharged, or is satisfied, every right conferred by it ends at that moment, and the Member’s interest is held free of it without further act of the Company or of any Member. The Company shall not treat an expired or discharged charging order as continuing in effect, and shall not pay any amount to its former holder.

(e) Redemption. While a charging order is in effect, the Company may purchase the charged interest, and any Member whose own interest is not charged may purchase it, by paying the amount then secured by the charging order. An interest purchased under this paragraph passes to the purchaser free of the charging order. Payment may be made in cash or in any other property the purchaser and the Company agree upon, and no consent of the charged Member is required.

(f) No admission of an involuntary transferee. A creditor, assignee, purchaser at a judicial or execution sale, receiver, liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy, or other involuntary transferee of a Member’s interest does not become a Member and acquires no right to become one, and no such person may be admitted as a Member except with the written consent of all Members other than the Member whose interest was transferred. That consent may be withheld for any reason or for no reason.

(g) Governing law and forum. This Agreement and the interests of the Members in the Company are governed by the law of Nevis. Every question concerning the rights of a creditor of a Member against that Member’s interest, including the availability, scope, and duration of any remedy, is to be determined by the courts of Nevis and under the law of Nevis.

The clause cannot bind a creditor. A creditor never signs the operating agreement, and no bargain among members shortens a remedy a Nevis court is willing to grant. What paragraphs (a) and (b) do is settle in advance what the membership interest itself carries, so a holder of a charging order takes an interest already stripped of voting, management, and information rights.

Paragraph (b) tracks the remedy the ordinance describes. In Wells Fargo Bank v. Barber the court read the Nevis provisions that govern a charged interest. It described the holder of a charging order as having the rights of an assignee and nothing more. Foreclosure was excluded, and the members whose interests were not charged held a right to redeem the charged one. The phrase “sole and exclusive remedy” belongs to Florida’s LLC statute rather than the Nevis text, so the clause states the limit in its own words.

Paragraph (c) is where a charging order goes to die. A lien on distributions is worth what the distributions are worth. Leaving every distribution to the manager’s discretion, and setting unpaid capital calls against amounts otherwise payable, lets the holder wait out the order and collect nothing.

Paragraph (d) states the consequence of expiry without stating the period. The ordinance sets the term, the term has moved as the ordinance has been rewritten, and the clause is drafted to follow whatever the current text provides. The duration appears in the charging order section above.

Paragraph (f) carries the strongest contractual protection in the box. A creditor who gets past the charging order and buys the interest at a sale still arrives holding an economic interest and nothing else, because admission as a member takes the consent of the other members, and consent can be refused.

Paragraph (g) answers the exposure the domestic enforcement section above describes. A federal court in Florida held in Barber that a member’s interest in a Nevis LLC is intangible property sitting with its Florida owner, so Florida remedies governed how the creditor could reach it. A governing law and forum paragraph gives the member an argument. It does not settle the question, which no court has settled.

Sample Creditor Bond and Security for Costs Clause

Security for the Costs of a Creditor Proceeding.

(a) Security required before proceedings. The Members acknowledge that a creditor is required to deposit a bond as security for costs before bringing an action or proceeding against a Member’s interest in the Company or against the property of the Company, in the amount and form required by the Nevis Limited Liability Company Ordinance and by any order of the Nevis High Court.

(b) No waiver. Neither the Company nor the Manager may waive the security described in paragraph (a), accept a reduced or substitute security, consent to a creditor proceeding without it, or agree to any order dispensing with it. A waiver, consent, or agreement given without the written consent of all Members other than the Member whose interest is the subject of the proceeding is void and of no effect.

(c) Duty to apply. If a creditor commences a proceeding of the kind described in paragraph (a) without depositing the required security, the Manager shall apply to the Nevis High Court for security for costs without delay, shall seek every order the Ordinance permits in respect of that proceeding, and shall oppose any application to reduce the security below the amount the Court has fixed.

(d) Costs. The Company shall bear the cost of defending a proceeding of the kind described in paragraph (a) and may recover that cost out of the security deposited, and any amount so recovered belongs to the Company. A Member whose own conduct gave rise to the proceeding shall reimburse the Company for any cost not recovered out of the security, and the Manager may charge the unreimbursed amount against distributions that would otherwise be payable to that Member.

The bond is statutory, and the clause does not create it. Nevis makes a creditor put up security for costs before it can begin. The ordinance fixes no dollar figure, and the Nevis High Court sets the amount. That is why paragraph (a) reads as an acknowledgment rather than as an obligation the agreement imposes.

The operative words sit in paragraphs (b) and (c). The bond protects the company, and a protection the manager can give away is not a protection. Paragraph (b) moves the waiver out of the manager’s hands and behind a consent the debtor-member cannot supply. Paragraph (c) turns the application for security into a duty rather than an option.

Paragraph (d) closes the loop on cost. A creditor pursuing a proceeding in Nevis must engage Nevis counsel on a non-contingent basis, so the creditor funds its own side of the fight from the start. Charging unrecovered costs against the responsible member’s distributions keeps the other members from paying for a dispute that is not theirs.

Neither clause reaches the risk that a court outside Nevis applies its own law instead. That risk is the reason an offshore trust owning the membership interest is the stronger structure.

Sample Nevis LLC Operating Agreement

The two provisions above belong inside a complete operating agreement, and the sample below shows where they sit. It is a basic form, not the agreement we use for clients. It sets out the Nevis provisions and the main standard articles in full, and names the tax, records, amendment, general, and execution articles rather than reproducing them.

Download the sample agreement: Word (.docx) | PDF · Part of our asset protection forms library.

A basic sample form. It is not the agreement we use for clients.

Banking and Practical Considerations

Opening bank accounts for a Nevis LLC, whether in the U.S. or offshore, requires more effort than opening accounts for a domestic entity. U.S. banks sometimes decline to open accounts for foreign LLCs, even when the member has an existing banking relationship. A federal EIN also helps at the bank, and so does filing IRS Form 8832 to elect disregarded-entity status, because banks are more willing to process an account application when a U.S. tax identification number is attached.

Banks have cut back on Caribbean relationships, which makes an offshore account harder to open than it once was. Minimum deposits vary widely by tier: retail banks in offshore jurisdictions commonly ask for $10,000 or more, and the banks that asset protection structures actually use generally require $100,000 to $500,000. Due diligence is more extensive than for a domestic account, so anyone forming a Nevis LLC should line up the bank before forming the LLC.

Costs

Forming a Nevis LLC typically costs $3,000 to $5,000 in legal fees, plus government filing fees and registered agent costs. Annual maintenance runs $1,200 to $2,000 for the registered agent and government renewal, plus any costs associated with U.S. tax compliance.

A Cook Islands trust costs about $21,000 to establish. A Nevis LLC appeals to people who want offshore protection and do not want to pay for a full trust arrangement. The LLC alone provides less protection, because the question of how U.S. courts treat a foreign LLC interest is unresolved.

When paired with an offshore trust, the LLC adds approximately $5,000 to initial setup and about $1,000 per year in ongoing expenses.

Tax Treatment and Reporting

A Nevis LLC does not provide any tax advantage to U.S. persons. Nevis ended the blanket tax exemption its LLCs once enjoyed. An LLC managed from the United States is a non-resident company, taxed in St. Kitts and Nevis only on income arising from a business or other source there, so an LLC holding foreign assets normally owes no local tax. U.S. citizens and residents owe tax on worldwide income regardless of where the income is earned or where the entity is organized.

A single-member Nevis LLC is treated as a foreign corporation by default, the opposite of a domestic single-member LLC. The member files Form 8832 to elect disregarded-entity status, which puts the LLC’s income and deductions on the member’s individual return. The election is due within 75 days of the date it takes effect. The member then files Form 8858 annually to report the foreign disregarded entity. When the LLC is owned by a foreign trust, the reporting chain becomes more complex and includes Forms 3520, 3520-A, FBAR, and Form 8938.

If the LLC maintains foreign financial accounts with an aggregate balance exceeding $10,000 at any point during the year, the U.S. member must file an FBAR. Penalties for missing these filings can exceed the value of the undisclosed accounts. Anyone establishing an offshore structure typically needs a CPA experienced in international tax compliance.

Nevis LLC vs. Cook Islands LLC

A Cook Islands LLC offers asset protection features comparable to a Nevis LLC. Both jurisdictions limit creditor remedies to charging orders and refuse to enforce a foreign judgment against a member’s interest. Nevis also sets a criminal standard of proof for fraudulent transfer claims; the Cook Islands LLC statute has no fraudulent transfer rule of its own.

The Cook Islands charging order lasts five years compared to three in Nevis. Nevis requires creditors to post a bond; the Cook Islands does not. The Cook Islands has a more developed trustee market.

For a standalone LLC without a trust, Nevis is generally the better choice because the shorter charging order duration and bond requirement create stronger deterrents. For an LLC paired with a Cook Islands trust, a Cook Islands LLC may simplify administration by keeping all entities under one jurisdiction’s laws.

Inside a trust structure, the differences between a Nevis LLC and a Cook Islands LLC are administrative rather than protective, because no creditor has standing to pursue the LLC directly in either jurisdiction.

Nevis LLC vs. Wyoming LLC

A Nevis LLC and a Wyoming LLC protect a member’s interest on similar statutory terms. Wyoming’s charging order statute is the exclusive creditor remedy and bars foreclosure of the interest, including where the debtor is the sole member, and Nevis applies its charging order rule to single-member and multi-member LLCs alike. What separates them is which court applies the statute: a Wyoming statute binds a Wyoming court, and a creditor who sues the member at home may persuade that court to apply its own state’s law.

Wyoming does not require creditors to post a bond. Nevis does, in an amount set by the Nevis High Court. Wyoming courts enforce out-of-state judgments as a matter of course. A Nevis court will not enforce a foreign judgment against a member’s interest at all, so the creditor has to start over in Nevis.

A Wyoming LLC costs $1,200 to $3,500 the first year and under $500 a year after that. That is well below what forming and keeping a Nevis LLC costs. For someone whose primary concern is business liability rather than personal asset protection against aggressive creditors, Wyoming may be sufficient. For someone facing claims large enough to reach liquid assets, a Nevis LLC forces the creditor out of U.S. courts entirely, which no domestic LLC does.

When a Nevis LLC Makes Sense

A standalone Nevis LLC fits people with moderate litigation exposure and $250,000 to $1,000,000 in transferable liquid assets. It gives them creditor deterrence without the cost of a full offshore trust.

People with higher asset levels, more severe litigation exposure, or a need for the strongest available protection should consider pairing the Nevis LLC with an offshore trust. The LLC keeps the member managing the accounts, and the charging order limit and the bond requirement still apply. The trust provides jurisdictional separation and an impossibility defense that the LLC alone cannot deliver.

Jon Alper

About the Author

Jon Alper

Jon Alper has spent more than three decades implementing domestic and offshore asset protection structures. His involvement in BankFirst v. UBS Paine Webber, Inc. helped establish foundational principles in asset protection law. University of Florida J.D. and Harvard M.A. Cited as a legal expert by the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Bloomberg.

View Full Profile →

Weekly Asset Protection Newsletter

Featured articles from Alper Law—delivered every week.