Offshore Trusts for Massachusetts Residents

Massachusetts homestead law protects up to $1 million in home equity, doubled to $2 million when both spouses qualify as elderly or disabled. Almost nothing else is protected. Bank accounts, brokerage holdings, business interests, and investment real estate have no general creditor exemption beyond retirement accounts and a small wildcard.

A Cook Islands trust addresses this exposure by placing liquid wealth under a foreign trustee who operates outside Massachusetts court jurisdiction. The trust does not replace the homestead or retirement protections that already work. It covers what Massachusetts law leaves exposed—the cash, securities, and business equity that a creditor can reach with a judgment.

Speak With a Cook Islands Trust Attorney

Jon and Gideon Alper specialize in creating Cook Islands trusts for clients nationwide. Consultations are free and confidential, by phone or Zoom, and usually available within one business day. You’ll speak directly with the attorney.

See Pricing & Book a Consultation
Attorneys Jon Alper and Gideon Alper

The Massachusetts Homestead Exemption and Its Limits

Massachusetts homestead law under Chapter 188 creates three tiers of protection. An automatic homestead of $125,000 applies to every homeowner without filing. A declared homestead, filed at the Registry of Deeds for $35, increases protection to $1 million. Homeowners aged 62 or older, or those with disabilities, can each claim $1 million individually, allowing a qualifying married couple to protect up to $2 million in home equity.

The declared homestead amount doubled in August 2024. The legislature raised it from $500,000 to $1 million through Chapter 150, and existing declarations do not need to be re-filed because the increased amount applies automatically. Filing a new declaration also relates back to the date of any earlier declaration, preserving continuous protection. Refinancing a mortgage does not void the homestead, and a declaration filed while the home is held in a revocable trust remains effective.

In Boston, Cambridge, Brookline, Newton, and the western suburbs, home prices regularly exceed $1 million. A homeowner with $1.8 million in equity has $800,000 exposed above the declared homestead. The homestead also does not protect against federal, state, or municipal tax liens, child support, alimony, or debts secured by the property.

More importantly, the homestead protects only the residence. Cash, securities, business ownership, investment real estate, and personal property receive no comparable treatment under Massachusetts law.

Does Tenancy by the Entireties Protect Financial Accounts?

Massachusetts recognizes tenancy by the entireties for real property only. A married couple holding their home as TBE is protected from creditors who have claims against only one spouse. This layers on top of the homestead. A physician whose malpractice exposure is individual, not joint, benefits from both protections on the same property.

Massachusetts does not extend TBE to bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or other personal property. States like Florida, Maryland, and Pennsylvania allow TBE for jointly held financial accounts, but Massachusetts limits the protection to real estate. Liquid assets remain exposed regardless of how they are titled between spouses.

Retirement Accounts, Life Insurance, and Wage Exemptions

ERISA-qualified retirement plans—401(k)s, pension plans, and profit-sharing plans—are fully protected from creditors under federal law regardless of balance. Massachusetts provides additional protection for state and municipal retirement benefits under several statutes, including M.G.L. Chapters 32 and 246.

Traditional and Roth IRAs do not receive unlimited protection in Massachusetts. In bankruptcy, the federal exemption caps IRA protection at approximately $1.7 million (adjusted periodically for inflation). Outside bankruptcy, Massachusetts courts have applied varying levels of protection to IRAs depending on the circumstances.

Life insurance proceeds payable to a spouse, child, or dependent are generally exempt from the policyholder’s creditors under Massachusetts law. This exemption applies to the death benefit and, in many cases, to the cash value of the policy while the insured is alive.

Massachusetts limits wage garnishment to the lesser of 15% of gross wages or the amount by which weekly wages exceed 50 times the state minimum wage ($15 per hour, or $750 per week). This is substantially more protective than the federal limit of 25% of disposable earnings. For high earners, though, 15% of gross income still represents a large dollar amount. A surgeon earning $35,000 per week could lose up to $5,250 per paycheck.

Massachusetts also offers a personal property wildcard exemption of approximately $6,000 and allows debtors to choose between state and federal bankruptcy exemptions, a feature not available in every state. The federal wildcard of approximately $13,900 is sometimes more advantageous.

Why Domestic Asset Protection Trusts Do Not Work for Massachusetts Residents

Massachusetts does not have a domestic asset protection trust statute. A Massachusetts resident who creates a DAPT in Nevada, South Dakota, or Delaware faces the same problem every non-DAPT-state resident faces. A creditor can sue in Massachusetts, and the court is unlikely to apply the DAPT state’s trust law to a local resident’s assets. The Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require Massachusetts courts to honor another state’s DAPT statute when the settlor lives in Massachusetts.

Even for residents of states that have enacted DAPT statutes, federal bankruptcy law creates a separate vulnerability. Under Bankruptcy Code § 548(e)(1), a trustee can claw back assets transferred to a self-settled trust within 10 years of filing. DAPTs do not override federal jurisdiction.

An offshore trust avoids both problems. Cook Islands courts do not recognize U.S. court judgments, and Massachusetts courts cannot compel a foreign trustee to act. Federal bankruptcy’s 10-year lookback does not reach assets held by a trustee operating under a foreign legal system.

The Millionaire Surtax and Non-Exempt Wealth Accumulation

Massachusetts voters approved a 4% surtax on income above $1 million in 2022, effective for tax year 2023. The combined state rate is 9% on income above that threshold, comparable to New York and approaching California levels.

The surtax does not directly affect asset protection, but it affects how quickly high earners accumulate non-exempt wealth. A surgeon earning $1.8 million annually pays approximately $32,000 more in state taxes than before the surtax. That money would otherwise build the liquid wealth that Massachusetts law does nothing to protect. For high earners already facing weak exemptions outside the homestead, the surtax compounds the problem by slowing the rate at which they build assets beyond their home and retirement accounts.

What a Cook Islands Trust Covers for Massachusetts Residents

A Cook Islands trust holds the assets that Massachusetts law leaves exposed: brokerage accounts, bank balances above operating needs, business interests, investment property proceeds, and any home equity above the $1 million homestead cap. The foreign trustee does not answer to Massachusetts courts, cannot be reached by Massachusetts creditors, and has no obligation to comply with domestic enforcement proceedings.

The trust works alongside the protections Massachusetts already provides. The declared homestead stays in place on the residence. Retirement accounts remain in domestic plans under ERISA protection. TBE continues to protect the home from individual creditor claims against one spouse. The offshore trust covers the specific category that Massachusetts law leaves unprotected.

Cook Islands trusts cost $20,000 to $25,000 to establish and $5,000 to $8,000 per year to maintain. Offshore planning is generally appropriate for people with $1 million or more in total assets, or $500,000 or more in liquidity. For Massachusetts residents whose non-exempt liquid wealth exceeds those thresholds, the cost addresses the mismatch between strong home protection and no protection for anything else.

IRS and Massachusetts Tax Reporting

An offshore trust does not change federal or Massachusetts income tax obligations. The IRS treats a Cook Islands trust as a grantor trust under IRC § 679—all income flows through to the settlor’s personal return. Required federal forms include Form 3520 and Form 3520-A annually, plus FBAR and Form 8938 for foreign accounts. A CPA handles all ongoing tax filings; the attorney structures the trust, and the CPA manages compliance.

Massachusetts taxes worldwide income at 5%, or 9% for income above $1 million under the surtax. The trust’s income remains fully taxable at both levels. Offshore asset protection does not reduce tax obligations—it changes where assets sit and who controls them, not how they are taxed.

Alper Law has structured offshore and domestic asset protection plans since 1991. Schedule a consultation or call (407) 444-0404.

Gideon Alper

About the Author

Gideon Alper

Gideon Alper focuses on asset protection planning, including Cook Islands trusts, offshore LLCs, and domestic strategies for individuals facing litigation exposure. He previously served as an attorney with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel in the Large Business and International Division. J.D. with honors from Emory University.

View Full Profile →

Weekly Asset Protection Newsletter

Featured articles from Alper Law—delivered every week.