Offshore Trusts for Massachusetts Residents

Massachusetts has one of the better homestead protections in the northeastern United States. A filed Declaration of Homestead shields up to $1 million in home equity, and elderly or disabled homeowners can protect up to $2 million per married couple. For home equity alone, Massachusetts offers meaningful protection.

The problem is everything else. Massachusetts does not permit domestic asset protection trusts. Bank accounts, brokerage holdings, business interests, and investment property equity have no general creditor exemption beyond retirement accounts.

A physician in Boston with $800,000 in home equity and $1.5 million in liquid assets has the home protected but the $1.5 million fully exposed. The 4% millionaire surtax (effective 2023 on income above $1 million) adds further pressure on high earners trying to build and retain non-exempt wealth.

Speak With a Cook Islands Trust Attorney

Jon Alper and Gideon Alper design and implement Cook Islands trusts for clients nationwide. Consultations are free and confidential.

Request a Consultation
Attorneys Jon Alper and Gideon Alper

The Homestead: Strong but Incomplete

Massachusetts homestead law under M.G.L. Chapter 188 creates three tiers of protection. An automatic homestead of $125,000 applies to every homeowner without any filing. A declared homestead, filed at the Registry of Deeds for $35, increases protection to $1 million. Homeowners aged 62 or older, or those with disabilities, can each claim $1 million, allowing a qualifying married couple to protect $2 million in home equity.

The declared homestead is retroactive. Filing a new declaration relates back to the date of any earlier declaration, preserving continuous protection. Refinancing a mortgage does not void the homestead. A declaration filed while the home is held in a revocable trust remains effective. These are well-designed features that make the Massachusetts homestead genuinely useful.

The limitations matter for high-net-worth homeowners. In Boston, Cambridge, Brookline, Newton, and the western suburbs, median home prices regularly exceed $1 million. A homeowner with $1.5 million in equity has $500,000 exposed above the declared homestead. And the homestead does not protect against tax liens (federal, state, or municipal), child support, alimony, or debts secured by the property itself.

More critically, the homestead protects only the residence. Cash, securities, business ownership, investment real estate, and personal property receive no comparable treatment. Massachusetts law does not provide any general exemption for liquid assets held outside retirement accounts.

Tenancy by Entireties: Limited to Real Property

Massachusetts recognizes tenancy by entireties for real property. Married couples who hold their home as TBE enjoy protection from creditors of only one spouse. This layers on top of the homestead: a married physician whose malpractice exposure is individual, not joint, benefits from both TBE and the declared homestead on the same property.

Massachusetts does not extend TBE to bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or other personal property. Unlike states such as Florida, Maryland, or Pennsylvania where TBE can protect jointly held financial accounts, Massachusetts limits the protection to real estate. Liquid assets remain exposed regardless of how they are titled between spouses.

The Millionaire Surtax Compounds the Problem

Massachusetts voters approved a 4% surtax on income above $1 million in 2022, effective for tax year 2023. Combined with the base rate of 5%, Massachusetts residents earning above $1 million pay 9% state income tax on the excess. This rate is comparable to New York and approaching California levels.

The surtax does not directly affect asset protection, but it affects the economics of wealth accumulation. A Massachusetts surgeon earning $1.8 million annually pays approximately $32,000 more in state taxes than before the surtax. That money would otherwise build the non-exempt liquid wealth that Massachusetts law does nothing to protect. The surtax accelerates the need for a protective structure by reducing the rate at which high earners can accumulate and diversify wealth outside their homes and retirement accounts.

What an Offshore Trust Covers

A Cook Islands trust for a Massachusetts resident holds the assets that state law does not protect: brokerage accounts, bank balances above operating needs, business interests, investment property proceeds, and any home equity above the $1 million homestead cap. The trust places these assets under a foreign trustee who does not answer to Massachusetts courts, cannot be reached by Massachusetts creditors, and has no obligation to comply with domestic enforcement proceedings.

The trust works alongside Massachusetts’s existing protections. The declared homestead stays in place on the residence. Retirement accounts remain in domestic plans under ERISA protection. TBE continues to protect the home from individual creditor claims against one spouse. The offshore trust covers the specific category of assets that Massachusetts law leaves exposed.

Cook Islands trusts cost $20,000 to $25,000 to establish and $5,000 to $10,000 per year to maintain. For Massachusetts residents whose non-exempt liquid assets exceed $500,000, the cost addresses the mismatch between strong home protection and no protection for anything else.

IRS and Massachusetts Tax Reporting

An offshore trust does not change federal or Massachusetts income tax obligations. The IRS treats the trust as a grantor trust under IRC Section 679. All income appears on the settlor’s personal return. Required forms include Form 3520 and Form 3520-A annually, plus FBAR and FATCA reporting for foreign accounts. Massachusetts taxes worldwide income at 5% (9% above $1 million with the surtax). The trust’s income remains fully taxable at both levels.

Gideon Alper

About the Author

Gideon Alper

Gideon Alper focuses on asset protection planning, including Cook Islands trusts, offshore LLCs, and domestic strategies for individuals facing litigation exposure. He previously served as an attorney with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel in the Large Business and International Division. J.D. with honors from Emory University.

View Full Profile →

Weekly Asset Protection Brief

New videos and featured articles from Alper Law—delivered every week.