How Cook Islands Trustee Companies Operate

A Cook Islands trustee company is a licensed financial services firm that holds legal title to trust assets and administers trusts under Cook Islands law. From the outside, the trustee is a name on a trust deed and a counterparty for distribution requests. From the inside, it is a small professional organization with legal, compliance, and administrative staff carrying out a specific set of operational functions for every trust under its management.

Understanding how these firms actually operate helps settlors set realistic expectations about response times, communication, and the trustee’s decision-making process. It also explains why certain administrative steps take the time they do and why the trustee sometimes asks questions or requests documentation that may seem unnecessary from the settlor’s perspective.

Staffing and Institutional Structure

Cook Islands trustee companies are small firms by global financial services standards. The licensed trustees operating in the Cook Islands typically employ between five and thirty professionals, with the larger firms at the upper end of that range. Staff generally include New Zealand or Australian-qualified lawyers and accountants who have relocated to or practice in the Cook Islands, compliance officers certified by the Financial Supervisory Commission, and administrative personnel who handle day-to-day trust accounting and correspondence.

This small scale has practical consequences. The trust officer assigned to a particular trust is often one of a handful of professionals managing dozens or hundreds of trusts simultaneously. Response times for routine inquiries are typically measured in business days rather than hours, and complex requests that require legal review or compliance assessment take longer.

One important structural point that Trustees & Fiduciaries has emphasized publicly: for an asset protection trust to function as intended, the trustee’s ownership, management, and operations must all be located in the Cook Islands. If any part of the trustee’s administration or decision-making occurs in a third jurisdiction, a court in that jurisdiction may assert authority over the trustee’s operations there, compromising the trust’s protective structure. This is why the location of the trustee’s actual operations matters, not just where the trustee is formally licensed.

Onboarding a New Trust

When a new Cook Islands trust is established, the trustee conducts its own due diligence before accepting appointment. This process runs in parallel with the trust deed drafting handled by the settlor’s U.S. counsel, and it is one of the reasons trust formation takes weeks rather than days.

The trustee’s onboarding process includes KYC verification of the settlor, all named beneficiaries, and any protector or other governance participants. This requires current passports or government-issued identification, proof of residential address, and in some cases professional or business background information. The trustee also conducts a source-of-funds review, requiring the settlor to document the origin of the assets being transferred into the trust. This is not a formality. The Cook Islands’ KYC and AML framework requires the trustee to satisfy itself that trust assets are not derived from criminal activity, and the trustee bears regulatory risk if it accepts funds without adequate documentation.

The trustee reviews the proposed trust deed to confirm that its terms are consistent with Cook Islands law and the trustee’s own operational policies. If the trust deed contains provisions that the trustee considers unworkable, inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations, or problematic from a regulatory perspective, the trustee will raise those issues with the settlor’s counsel before accepting appointment.

Once the trustee is satisfied with the due diligence and the trust deed’s terms, it accepts appointment, the trust is registered with the Cook Islands High Court Registry, and the trustee begins establishing the trust’s banking and custody relationships.

Management Models

Cook Islands law provides flexibility in how the trustee-settlor relationship is structured. The trust deed can establish different management models depending on how much day-to-day involvement the settlor wants to retain.

Under a sole trustee arrangement, the licensed Cook Islands trustee holds legal title and exercises all trustee functions. The settlor communicates with the trustee through the channels the trust deed establishes but does not participate in administrative decisions. This is the simplest model and provides the cleanest separation between the settlor and trust administration.

Under a co-trustee arrangement, the Cook Islands trustee serves alongside a second trustee, which may be a domestic individual or entity. The trust deed divides responsibilities between the co-trustees. A common division gives the Cook Islands trustee custodian functions (holding title, maintaining accounts) while the domestic co-trustee handles managing trustee functions (investment decisions, day-to-day management). This model gives the settlor more direct involvement through the domestic co-trustee, but it also creates the kind of retained control that proved problematic in the Anderson case. Co-trustee arrangements require careful drafting to ensure the domestic co-trustee’s authority does not undermine the trust’s asset protection.

Under an advisory trustee arrangement, the Cook Islands trustee is the sole trustee but is authorized to receive and follow advice from an advisory trustee, typically the settlor or the settlor’s financial advisor. The trustee is excused from liability when it acts in accordance with the advisory trustee’s recommendations. This model preserves the settlor’s influence over investment decisions while keeping legal title and administrative authority with the Cook Islands trustee. Like the co-trustee model, it requires careful drafting to avoid the appearance of settlor control.

The protector vs. trustee roles article explains how the protector’s oversight function relates to whichever management model the trust adopts.

How the Trustee Handles Instructions

During normal operations, the trustee receives instructions and requests from the settlor, the protector, and occasionally from beneficiaries. How the trustee processes these communications is central to the trust’s legitimacy as an independent structure.

The trustee does not simply execute instructions. It evaluates each request against the trust deed’s terms, its own fiduciary obligations, and applicable regulatory requirements. A distribution request is reviewed against the trust deed’s distribution provisions and the trustee’s assessment of the trust’s financial position. An investment instruction from an advisory trustee is evaluated for consistency with the trust deed’s investment parameters. A request to add a beneficiary is checked against the trust deed’s amendment provisions and may require the protector’s consent.

This review process is not bureaucratic delay. It is the trustee exercising the independent judgment that distinguishes a functioning trust from a conduit. Every documented instance of the trustee independently evaluating a request strengthens the trust’s position if a creditor later argues that the trustee was merely following the settlor’s orders. The discretionary distributions article explains how this independent judgment operates specifically in the context of distribution decisions.

When the trustee disagrees with a request, it communicates its concerns to the settlor or protector and works toward a resolution. If the disagreement cannot be resolved, the protector has the authority to replace the trustee. But the possibility of replacement does not mean the trustee should avoid exercising independent judgment. A trustee that never pushes back is not fulfilling its fiduciary role.

Investment Management

Trustee companies in the Cook Islands are trust administrators, not investment managers. Most Cook Islands trustees do not run proprietary investment portfolios or provide investment advisory services. Instead, they facilitate the settlor’s investment strategy through one of several arrangements.

In the most common structure, the trust owns a Cook Islands LLC, and the LLC holds accounts at international banks or brokerage firms. During normal operations, the settlor manages these accounts as LLC manager, making investment decisions directly. The trustee holds legal title but does not intervene in day-to-day investment activity unless the trust deed requires it.

Some trusts engage independent investment managers, either appointed by the settlor or selected with the trustee’s input. The investment manager operates under a mandate defined in the trust deed or a separate investment management agreement, and the trustee monitors the manager’s performance at a high level without directing specific trades.

In either case, the trustee’s role in investment management is custodial and supervisory rather than active. The trustee ensures that the trust’s investment arrangements are consistent with the trust deed, that the relevant accounts are properly titled in the trust’s or LLC’s name, and that investment activity is reflected in the trust’s financial records for reporting purposes.

Regulatory Compliance Operations

A significant portion of the trustee’s operational capacity is devoted to regulatory compliance. Licensed trustees are subject to ongoing supervision by the Financial Supervisory Commission under the Trustee Companies Act 2014 and the Financial Transactions Reporting Act.

The trustee maintains a register of every international trust for which it serves as trustee, available for inspection by the FSC. It files periodic regulatory returns with the FSC and responds to supervisory inquiries and examinations. It maintains and updates KYC records for all parties to the trust, including periodic re-verification as identification documents expire or circumstances change. It monitors trust transactions for suspicious activity and files suspicious transaction reports with the Cook Islands Financial Intelligence Unit when required.

These compliance functions are mandatory and non-delegable. The trustee cannot outsource its AML/KYC obligations to the settlor’s U.S. counsel or to a third-party compliance provider. This is one reason trustee annual fees reflect more than just the administrative work visible to the settlor. A substantial portion of the fee supports the compliance infrastructure that keeps the trustee’s license in good standing and the trust within the regulatory framework.

The licensing requirements article describes the FSC’s regulatory framework in more detail, and the regulation comparison article compares Cook Islands trustee regulation to other jurisdictions.

Coordination with U.S. Advisors

For trusts with U.S. settlors, the trustee regularly coordinates with the settlor’s domestic professional team, particularly the CPA responsible for IRS reporting.

The trustee prepares and provides the trust’s annual financial statements, which the CPA uses to prepare Forms 3520-A and to support the settlor’s Form 3520 filing. The trustee provides transaction records, distribution summaries, and account statements needed for FBAR and Form 8938 filings. Timing matters here: if the trustee’s financial records are delivered late, the CPA may not have time to prepare the filings before their deadlines, which exposes the settlor to penalties. The common administration mistakes article identifies CPA coordination as a recurring source of compliance problems.

The trustee also coordinates with U.S. counsel on trust amendments, governance changes, and any structural adjustments that affect the trust’s U.S. tax treatment. This coordination is routine for experienced trustees but can become a bottleneck if the trustee is unfamiliar with U.S. reporting requirements or unresponsive to the CPA’s documentation requests.

Continuity and Staff Turnover

Because Cook Islands trustee companies are small firms in a small jurisdiction, staff turnover is a practical consideration over the multi-decade life of a trust. The trust officer who managed the trust at formation may not be the same person managing it ten or twenty years later.

Well-run trustee companies manage this through institutional record-keeping: comprehensive file notes for every trust, documented decision rationale for distributions and other exercises of discretion, and standardized administrative procedures that do not depend on any single individual’s knowledge. When a trust officer transitions, the incoming officer should be able to reconstruct the trust’s history and the trustee’s reasoning from the file.

Settlors can support this continuity by maintaining their own records of significant interactions with the trustee and by conducting periodic reviews with the trustee to confirm that the trust’s file is current and complete. If the trustee’s primary contact for the trust changes, the settlor or protector should request an introductory meeting with the new officer to confirm that the transition has been handled properly.

For a comprehensive overview of Cook Islands trust administration, return to the administration overview. For information about Cook Islands trust structure, formation, and costs, return to the Cook Islands trust overview.

Gideon Alper

About the Author

Gideon Alper focuses his practice on asset protection planning, including Cook Islands trusts, offshore LLC structures, and domestic strategies for individuals facing litigation exposure. He previously served as an attorney with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel in their international business division, giving him a unique perspective on cross-border planning and compliance. A graduate of Emory University Law School (with Honors), Gideon has advised thousands of clients on asset protection over more than fifteen years of practice. He has been quoted by CNN, Fox Business, the Wall Street Journal, and the Daily Business Review.

Sign up for the latest information.

Get regular updates from our blog, where we discuss asset protection techniques and answer common questions.