IRA Protection from Creditors by State
IRA creditor protection varies dramatically across the United States. Some states protect IRAs fully and without dollar limits. Others cap the exemption at specific dollar amounts, limit protection to funds reasonably necessary for the debtor’s support, or exclude certain IRA types entirely. The differences matter for anyone with substantial retirement savings, especially people considering a move between states or holding IRAs in multiple jurisdictions.
Federal bankruptcy law provides a separate IRA exemption capped at approximately $1.7 million for the 2025 to 2028 period. States that have opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions require debtors to use state exemptions instead. Florida is among the states that have opted out, but its unlimited state exemption is more generous than the federal cap for IRA owners with large account balances.
Full IRA Protection States
Most states provide full creditor protection for both traditional and Roth IRAs without a dollar limit. States in this category include Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Washington. In these states, the entire IRA balance is exempt from judgment creditors outside of bankruptcy, regardless of how much the account holds.
Florida falls into this category but goes further than most. Florida Statute 222.21 protects traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, SEP-IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, rollover IRAs, and inherited IRAs without any dollar cap. The inherited IRA protection is particularly significant because most states do not extend their exemption to inherited accounts, and federal bankruptcy law excludes inherited IRAs from the retirement account exemption entirely.
Speak With a Florida Asset Protection Attorney
Jon Alper and Gideon Alper have designed and implemented asset protection structures for clients since 1991. Consultations are confidential and conducted by phone or Zoom.
Book a Consultation
States with Dollar Caps
Several states limit IRA creditor protection to a specific dollar amount. The caps vary widely.
Nevada exempts up to $500,000 per IRA account. South Dakota caps its exemption at $1 million. North Dakota limits protection to $100,000 per account with a $200,000 aggregate cap across all accounts. Minnesota exempts up to $69,000, with additional protection available if the debtor demonstrates the funds are necessary for support.
Dollar caps create a meaningful risk for high-net-worth individuals. An IRA balance that exceeds the state cap is exposed to creditor claims for the excess amount. Individuals in capped states who accumulate significant retirement savings may benefit from diversifying into ERISA-qualified employer plans such as a 401(k), which receive unlimited federal protection regardless of state law.
States with Needs-Based Protection
A smaller group of states limits IRA protection to amounts reasonably necessary for the debtor’s support or the support of dependents. California is the most notable example. California exempts traditional IRAs only to the extent necessary for retirement support, and its statute does not clearly protect Roth IRAs at all.
Georgia similarly limits its IRA exemption to amounts necessary for the debtor’s support and does not exempt Roth IRAs. Nebraska and Maine follow the same pattern, with Maine capping protection at $15,000 unless the debtor demonstrates a greater need.
Needs-based standards introduce uncertainty because the amount protected depends on judicial evaluation of the debtor’s circumstances. A court determines what the debtor reasonably needs for retirement, considering age, health, income, and other available resources. The same IRA balance might be fully protected for a 62-year-old retiree and only partially protected for a 35-year-old professional.
States That Exclude Roth IRAs
Several states protect traditional IRAs but do not extend the same protection to Roth IRAs. California, Georgia, Maine, Mississippi, Nebraska, and West Virginia fall into this category. The exclusion typically results from statutory language that references tax-deferred retirement accounts, which technically excludes Roth IRAs because Roth contributions are made with after-tax dollars.
The practical impact depends on the size of the Roth IRA relative to other protected assets. A debtor in one of these states with a large Roth IRA balance faces meaningful exposure that would not exist with a traditional IRA or an ERISA-qualified plan.
Inherited IRA Protection
Federal bankruptcy law does not protect inherited IRAs. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that inherited IRAs are not retirement funds within the meaning of the federal bankruptcy exemption because the beneficiary did not set aside the money for their own retirement.
A small number of states have enacted statutes that specifically protect inherited IRAs from creditors regardless of the federal rule. Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas each provide explicit statutory protection for inherited IRAs. In these states, a beneficiary who inherits an IRA can protect it from creditors using the state exemption even in bankruptcy.
In states that do not specifically protect inherited IRAs, the beneficiary’s creditors may be able to reach the inherited account. Naming a trust with spendthrift provisions as the IRA beneficiary, rather than the individual, can preserve creditor protection regardless of which state the beneficiary resides in. Florida’s unlimited IRA exemption under ยง 222.21 extends to inherited accounts, making it one of the strongest retirement asset protection frameworks in the country.
IRA Creditor Protection Lookback Periods by State
Many states deny protection for IRA contributions made within a specified period before bankruptcy or a creditor claim. Lookback provisions target last-minute transfers of non-exempt assets into protected retirement accounts.
Alaska, Arizona, Kentucky, and Michigan each deny protection for contributions made within 120 days before bankruptcy. Louisiana and Pennsylvania use a one-year lookback. Hawaii applies a three-year lookback period. New York denies protection for contributions made within 90 days before a judgment. Montana takes a different approach, denying protection for contributions that exceed 15% of the debtor’s gross income in the year before bankruptcy.
Florida has no contribution lookback period in its IRA exemption statute. However, a contribution made with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors can still be challenged as a fraudulent conversion under Florida Statute 222.30. Withdrawals from a protected IRA also raise separate questions about whether the funds remain exempt once distributed, an issue addressed in Florida’s retirement account withdrawal rules.
IRA creditor protection is one component of Florida’s broader asset protection framework, which also shields homestead property, wages, annuities, and life insurance from most judgment creditors.
State-by-State Comparison Table
| State | IRA Exempt | Roth IRA Exempt | Special Provisions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Yes | Yes | No additional restrictions |
| Alaska | Yes | Yes | Contributions within 120 days before bankruptcy not exempt |
| Arizona | Yes | Yes | QDRO claims not exempt; 120-day lookback |
| Arkansas | Yes | Yes | Exemption constitutionality challenged for contract claims |
| California | Partly | No | Exempt only to extent necessary for retirement support |
| Colorado | Yes | Yes | Subject to child support and felonious killing claims |
| Connecticut | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Delaware | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from domestic relations claims |
| Florida | Yes | Yes | Inherited IRAs protected; unlimited; subject to QDRO |
| Georgia | Yes | No | Exempt only to extent necessary for support |
| Hawaii | Yes | Yes | 3-year lookback for contributions before bankruptcy |
| Idaho | Yes | Yes | Applies only to negligence/wrongful act claims |
| Illinois | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Indiana | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Iowa | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Kansas | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Kentucky | Yes | Yes | 120-day lookback; not exempt from child support |
| Louisiana | Yes | Yes | 1-year lookback for contributions before bankruptcy |
| Maine | Partly | No | Exempt up to $15,000 or as necessary for support |
| Maryland | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from health department debts |
| Massachusetts | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from divorce, child support, or restitution |
| Michigan | Yes | Yes | 120-day lookback; not exempt from family court orders |
| Minnesota | Yes | Yes | Exempt up to $69,000, plus support-based additional protection |
| Mississippi | Yes | No | No additional restrictions |
| Missouri | Yes | Yes | 3-year lookback for fraudulent transfers before bankruptcy |
| Montana | Yes | Yes | Contributions exceeding 15% of gross income in past year not exempt |
| Nebraska | Partly | No | Exempt only if necessary for support |
| Nevada | Yes | Yes | Exempt up to $500,000 per account |
| New Hampshire | Yes | Yes | Applies only to debts incurred after 1999 |
| New Jersey | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| New Mexico | Yes | Yes | Fully protected |
| New York | Yes | Yes | 90-day lookback for contributions before judgment |
| North Carolina | Yes | Yes | Inherited IRAs specifically protected |
| North Dakota | Yes | Yes | $100,000 per account, $200,000 total cap |
| Ohio | Yes | Yes | SEPs and SIMPLE IRAs not exempt |
| Oklahoma | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Oregon | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| Pennsylvania | Yes | Yes | 1-year lookback for contributions exceeding $15,000 |
| Rhode Island | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from divorce or child support |
| South Carolina | Yes | Yes | Inherited IRAs specifically protected |
| South Dakota | Yes | Yes | Exempt up to $1 million |
| Tennessee | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from QDROs |
| Texas | Yes | Yes | Inherited IRAs specifically protected |
| Utah | Yes | Yes | 1-year lookback for contributions |
| Vermont | Yes | Yes | Non-deductible traditional IRA contributions not exempt |
| Virginia | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from child/spousal support |
| Washington | Yes | Yes | No restrictions |
| West Virginia | Yes | No | No additional restrictions |
| Wisconsin | Yes | Yes | Not exempt from family court orders |
| Wyoming | Partly | Partly | Exempt only for solvent contributions |